Natural News Explains Tyrannical Law

Concentration or "Work Camp" with False Promise that Labouring for Der Fuhrer Would Make One Free

Read this carefully, and find out how little it takes to be affected adversely (to say the least) by the bill signed into law on Saturday by a man who pretended to be a proponent of human rights: http://www.naturalnews.com/034538_NDAA_American_citizens_indefinite_detainment.html

>Clown Awards Show: Catastrophic Clothes

>http://omg.yahoo.com/photos/red-carpet-report-card-2011-acm-awards/4712/1#OmgPhoid=18
Click on the link to see hideous clothes, followed by illiterate and inaccurate comments. No, it is NOT the camera’s fault–the trousers are about eight inches below his waist, robbing this fashion-victim of visual leg-length. And how does one tuck a shirt into a pant-waist when there isn’t one? This fellow is just one of many in the line-up of “country stars” shown here whose pants/trousers land so far below the navel that they look like their legs are a foot long.

Courtesy of M-J de Mesterton

Clown Awards Show: Catastrophic Clothes

http://omg.yahoo.com/photos/red-carpet-report-card-2011-acm-awards/4712/1#OmgPhoid=18
Click on the link to see hideous clothes, followed by illiterate and inaccurate comments. No, it is NOT the camera’s fault–the trousers are about eight inches below his waist, robbing this fashion-victim of visual leg-length. And how does one tuck a shirt into a pant-waist when there isn’t one? This fellow is just one of many in the line-up of “country stars” shown here whose pants/trousers land so far below the navel that they look like their legs are a foot long.

>It’s Not the Bagginess that Offends, Butt…

>

…I mean but the low-hanging thereof. My photo shows elegant baggy or wide-legged trousers. Baggy pants, as in Oxford Bags, have been chic for decades in classic clothing. But, most people, when referring to the problem of low-sagging pants (trousers) just use the term, “baggy pants”. That’s really unfair, since what is being excoriated is the plumber’s crack, a source of derision for all times. What people abhor is the hideous sagging lowdown pants/trousers style. It really amounts to indecent exposure–someone’s underwear and opening showing in front, and whatever you wish to call it bared in the back–that’s the issue. Here is an article which I was sent by Sweden’s The Local–News in English:

http://www.thelocal.se/8941/

M-J de Mesterton©2007
Note: I originally posted this, together with my original poem on the subject, in 2007.

Courtesy of M-J de Mesterton

It’s Not the Bagginess that Offends, Butt…

…I mean but the low-hanging thereof. My photo shows elegant baggy or wide-legged trousers. Baggy pants, as in Oxford Bags, have been chic for decades in classic clothing. But, most people, when referring to the problem of low-sagging pants (trousers) just use the term, “baggy pants”. That’s really unfair, since what is being excoriated is the plumber’s crack, a source of derision for all times. What people abhor is the hideous sagging lowdown pants/trousers style. It really amounts to indecent exposure–someone’s underwear and opening showing in front, and whatever you wish to call it bared in the back–that’s the issue. Here is an article which I was sent by Sweden’s The Local–News in English:

http://www.thelocal.se/8941/

M-J de Mesterton©2007
Note: I originally posted this, together with my original poem on the subject, in 2007.

It’s Not the Bagginess that Offends, Butt…

…I mean but the low-hanging thereof. My photo shows elegant baggy or wide-legged trousers. Baggy pants, as in Oxford Bags, have been chic for decades in classic clothing. But, most people, when referring to the problem of low-sagging pants (trousers) just use the term, “baggy pants”. That’s really unfair, since what is being excoriated is the plumber’s crack, a source of derision for all times. What people abhor is the hideous sagging lowdown pants/trousers style. It really amounts to indecent exposure–someone’s underwear and opening showing in front, and whatever you wish to call it bared in the back–that’s the issue. Here is an article which I was sent by Sweden’s The Local–News in English:

http://www.thelocal.se/8941/

M-J de Mesterton©2007
Note: I originally posted this, together with my original poem on the subject, in 2007.

It’s Not the Bagginess that Offends, Butt…

…I mean but the low-hanging thereof. My photo shows elegant baggy or wide-legged trousers. Baggy pants, as in Oxford Bags, have been chic for decades in classic clothing. But, most people, when referring to the problem of low-sagging pants (trousers) just use the term, “baggy pants”. That’s really unfair, since what is being excoriated is the plumber’s crack, a source of derision for all times. What people abhor is the hideous sagging lowdown pants/trousers style. It really amounts to indecent exposure–someone’s underwear and opening showing in front, and whatever you wish to call it bared in the back–that’s the issue. Here is an article which I was sent by Sweden’s The Local–News in English:

http://www.thelocal.se/8941/

M-J de Mesterton©2007
Note: I originally posted this, together with my original poem on the subject, in 2007.

It’s Not the Bagginess that Offends, Butt…

…I mean but the low-hanging thereof. My photo shows elegant baggy or wide-legged trousers. Baggy pants, as in Oxford Bags, have been chic for decades in classic clothing. But, most people, when referring to the problem of low-sagging pants (trousers) just use the term, “baggy pants”. That’s really unfair, since what is being excoriated is the plumber’s crack, a source of derision for all times. What people abhor is the hideous sagging lowdown pants/trousers style. It really amounts to indecent exposure–someone’s underwear and opening showing in front, and whatever you wish to call it bared in the back–that’s the issue. Here is an article which I was sent by Sweden’s The Local–News in English:

http://www.thelocal.se/8941/

M-J de Mesterton©2007
Note: I originally posted this, together with my original poem on the subject, in 2007.